For years there was a single reputable option to keep data on a personal computer – using a hard disk drive (HDD). Then again, this kind of technology is actually displaying it’s age – hard drives are loud and sluggish; they’re power–ravenous and have a tendency to generate lots of heat for the duration of serious procedures.

SSD drives, however, are quick, take in far less power and are much cooler. They provide an exciting new method to file access and data storage and are years in advance of HDDs in relation to file read/write speed, I/O performance as well as energy capability. Find out how HDDs fare up against the newer SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

Because of a revolutionary new method to disk drive general performance, SSD drives make it possible for considerably quicker data access speeds. With an SSD, data file access times are much lower (under 0.1 millisecond).

Image

HDD drives even now work with the exact same general data file access technique that was actually created in the 1950s. Though it was considerably improved since that time, it’s sluggish when compared with what SSDs will offer. HDD drives’ data file access speed can vary somewhere between 5 and 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

On account of the brand new revolutionary file storage approach shared by SSDs, they have faster file access rates and faster random I/O performance.

In the course of 2HostLive Networks’s tests, all of the SSDs revealed their capability to deal with at the least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

With an HDD drive, the I/O performance gradually increases the more you use the disk drive. Nevertheless, just after it actually reaches a specific cap, it can’t proceed quicker. And because of the now–old technology, that I/O cap is significantly lower than what you could get with an SSD.

HDD are only able to go as much as 400 IO’s per second.

3. Reliability

Image

The absence of moving components and spinning disks in SSD drives, as well as the latest advances in electronic interface technology have led to a considerably reliable data storage device, having an normal failing rate of 0.5%.

Image

As we have mentioned, HDD drives rely upon rotating disks. And something that employs plenty of moving parts for extended intervals is susceptible to failure.

HDD drives’ common rate of failure ranges somewhere between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSDs don’t have moving components and need very little chilling power. Additionally, they demand a small amount of power to operate – tests have established that they can be operated by a normal AA battery.

As a whole, SSDs take in between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

From the minute they were created, HDDs have always been extremely electrical power–hungry equipment. And when you have a server with different HDD drives, this will likely add to the regular monthly electricity bill.

On average, HDDs consume somewhere between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

SSD drives support swifter file accessibility speeds, which, consequently, allow the CPU to finish file requests considerably faster and then to go back to additional duties.

The regular I/O hold out for SSD drives is just 1%.

Image

By using an HDD, you must dedicate additional time looking forward to the outcome of one’s data call. It means that the CPU will remain idle for additional time, expecting the HDD to react.

The average I/O wait for HDD drives is approximately 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

It’s about time for a few real–world examples. We produced an entire system backup with a server only using SSDs for file storage reasons. In that process, the standard service time for any I/O query remained beneath 20 ms.

Image

During the identical tests with the same hosting server, this time around equipped out utilizing HDDs, effectiveness was substantially sluggish. Throughout the server back–up process, the typical service time for I/O calls fluctuated between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

Speaking about back ups and SSDs – we have found a great enhancement in the back up rate since we moved to SSDs. Right now, a common hosting server backup can take solely 6 hours.

Image

On the other hand, with a hosting server with HDD drives, the same back up will take three to four times as long to finish. An entire backup of any HDD–powered server typically takes 20 to 24 hours.

Our Linux website hosting packages accounts include SSD drives automatically. Be a part of our family here, at 2HostLive Networks, and discover the way we could help you improve your website.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Our Virtual Private Servers provide no setup charges and work in a reliable network offering 99.9% of uptime. Full admin server access warranted.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Examine the tools and characteristics coming with 2HostLive Networks’s Virtual Private Servers. You could start with a smaller VPS configuration and move up with simply a mouse click as your needs grow.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • Get in touch with us 24 hours a day by email or by employing our really–fast ticketing system. Our techs are prepared to reply to any queries in up to 1 hour.